Tuesday, November 19, 2024
HomeBTCAn Interview With KPMG’s Brian Consolvo

An Interview With KPMG’s Brian Consolvo


This text is featured in Bitcoin Journal’s “The Main Situation”. Click on right here to get your Annual Bitcoin Journal Subscription.

Click on right here to obtain a PDF of this text.

Tuesday, August twenty ninth @ 11:36 AM

The next is an interview with Brian Consolvo, Principal–Expertise Threat at KPMG. He’s a co-author of KPMG’s new report “Bitcoin’s position within the ESG crucial” alongside KPMG’s Director of ESG and Local weather Advisory Kirk-Patrick Caron. The report is a big milestone in mainstream Bitcoin discourse, significantly on environmental grounds, and represents some extent of convergence between pro-Bitcoin environmental advocates and a wider swath of the skilled world concerned within the ESG panorama.

For a few years, Bitcoiners have taken concern with the narratives put forth by these with an unfavorable view of the expertise, and have been pissed off with unfounded and hysterical claims from Bitcoin detractors on its environmental and social deserves.

This interview covers the latest KPMG report and has been edited for concision and readability. The views of co-author Brian Consolvo are his personal and don’t essentially symbolize the angle of KPMG.

Nichols: To kick issues off, what was the impetus behind penning this report? Why did you resolve to have a look at Bitcoin by means of an ESG lens, and was there something particularly that prompted that?

Consolvo: If I simply suppose again to the period of time I’ve been on this area and seeing what among the critics put forth about Bitcoin, after which going by means of my very own journey with KPMG, who is clearly very huge on ESG, you begin going by means of every of the classes and are available throughout a whole lot of the advantages that Bitcoin supplies — each the asset and the expertise. It’s fascinating as a result of lots of people assault the power consumption, which once more is just one a part of the ESG framework, however I feel I’d by no means actually seen anybody take a full try at explaining all the advantages that it supplies throughout all three pillars.

The large impetus was the article that got here out again in January-February by the New York Instances that attacked Bitcoin’s power consumption. I believed, “Hey this can be a actually good time for me to make use of my platform to doc all the advantages, all the general public good that Bitcoin does”. I form of had a basic concept about what I used to be going to place within the paper, however as I began researching, I began coming throughout all these different issues I had by no means even considered. I feel the paper did a reasonably good job of exhibiting how a lot good it does versus simply the identical sort of FUD we hear day in and day trip.

Nichols: Why do you suppose there’s a lot FUD on the market? The place and why does this FUD emanate, and what can we do to resolve it?

Consolvo: For me, it comes right down to training. Bitcoin is simply such a fancy subject. It’s not one thing that most individuals perceive very nicely. After I return to after I first began to analysis Bitcoin and do my very own homework on it, it took me some time. It was sort of irritating since you’re like: “What am I lacking right here? Why don’t I get this?”, as a result of it’s simply not foundational ideas that we’re all used to. It requires you to be open-minded to not simply how Bitcoin works, however to know what issues it’s truly fixing. So then you definitely begin to perceive how Bitcoin works, however earlier than you possibly can even go any additional, you begin having to analysis economics and it’s important to begin being an professional in power consumption and issues like that. It’s only a very broad vary of matters that Bitcoin begins to the touch.

I feel the report does a reasonably good job of claiming “Sure, Bitcoin does use a whole lot of power, however I don’t suppose power consumption is absolutely the difficulty right here”, and we have to actually give attention to the emissions behind that power manufacturing. I might flip it round and ask any person who’s a staunch Bitcoin critic: “For those who’re involved in regards to the quantity of power that it’s utilizing, if the world may snap its fingers and transfer to a completely sustainable power combine, would you continue to assault the power consumption?” I don’t suppose they’d. In order that’s why it’s important to actually convey it again to the emissions, however then additionally take a look at the ways in which it’s truly serving to with the transition to extra sustainable power and the way in which it’s capable of assist monetize a few of these initiatives.

Click on the picture above to subscribe!

Nichols: You delineate between Scope One and Scope Two emissions as they relate to Bitcoin. Are you able to stroll us by means of that? What’s Bitcoin’s emissions profile and the way do you contextualize the emissions Bitcoin is related to?

Consolvo: Folks hear about all of the environmental impacts of Bitcoin and we tried to make it clear within the paper: Scope One emissions are nearly zero for Bitcoin, it’s simply utilizing electrical energy.

It’s humorous as a result of, I assume society sees electrical autos as zero-emission autos which for probably the most half, that’s comparatively true — they’re not utilizing combustion and gasoline and many others., they’re operating on electrical energy. Bitcoin is not any totally different. Bitcoin runs off electrical energy. However, the place the Scope Two emissions come from is: The place is that power coming from? Is it coming from an influence plant burning fossil fuels, or is it coming from a photo voltaic or wind farm? That’s the place we attempt to make that distinction within the paper.

One of many issues my ESG counterpart Kirk-Patrick Caron truly identified to me within the paper is that some bitcoin mining truly does have Scope One emissions. If you concentrate on utilizing flared fuel, you’re utilizing one thing that enters into the ambiance at the very least to a point. So I feel behind the meter, mining does have some Scope One emissions, however by and enormous, the business is primarily zero emissions because it pertains to Scope One.

Nichols: I need to dig down slightly bit extra into the pure fuel part of this. Your report mentions Crusoe Power in addition to Vespene. Are you able to describe what individuals are utilizing this vented methane for and sort of what the potential of this is likely to be when it comes to decreasing GHG emissions from a market-based mechanism? There’s pure incentive right here, which I discover pretty novel.

Consolvo: If you concentrate on Crusoe Power and their partnership with Exxon to co-locate round what they’re doing across the oil and fuel wells — an organization like Crusoe can co-locate subsequent to them and fairly than letting that methane enter the ambiance immediately, they convert it to power use. So now you’ve an organization like Exxon who not solely is ready to scale back the greenhouse gasses that they’re answerable for, however they’re capable of monetize it.

So the query that I’m asking is: Why the hell isn’t each single oil and fuel producer reaching out and partnering with bitcoin miners to do precisely that?

A few of it’s only a matter of notion with a few of these corporations. However once more, I feel it goes again to training. Think about being a giant government at some oil and fuel producer and somebody’s telling you, “Hey we have to associate with these bitcoin miners and right here’s why”. You’re in all probability pondering, “Wait a minute. That sounds sort of loopy”, proper? Particularly given preconceived notions you may need about Bitcoin. However I feel that’s one thing that can probably change over time given the profit that every celebration has.

Nichols: So far as how a lot landfill pure fuel is on the market, are you able to communicate to that so far as the potential of Bitcoin to seize this? You do point out Vespene within the report, I might be curious for a bit extra colour there.

Consolvo: They have been in all probability one of many really distinctive use circumstances that I got here throughout earlier than doing the paper. They’re mainly co-locating at landfills to make use of the methane that seeps out of these areas — I feel landfills are one of many greatest contributors of greenhouse gases, in order that’s one other instance that you possibly can begin to see much more adoption simply given the advantages to each events and what it may possibly assist do to your greenhouse fuel emission profile.

Nichols: The final piece on the power topic I’d prefer to go over is the grid administration side of Bitcoin so far as demand response. You point out winter storm Uri in Texas for instance. Are you able to communicate to the significance of balancing load on the grid and what position Bitcoin can play in that? Why is demand response necessary for the grid as we convey extra renewable power technology on-line?

Consolvo: I’m not an power professional, however I feel the lengthy and in need of it’s when you’ve a public utility that’s producing energy, they must generate extra energy than they’re truly going to make use of, given the totally different fluctuations in demand all through the day. It’s known as a duck curve, the place the quantity of energy that we use fluctuates all through the day and it sort of seems to be like a duck whenever you map it out on a chart: Most energy consumption takes place across the early night when everybody’s getting house from work. Let’s say we get house from work at 6 p.m. Properly, at 6 o’clock in December, the solar’s not shining, so that you’re probably not capable of faucet into photo voltaic power. Wind provide generally is a little bit extra problematic, simply given the dearth of ample predictability.

However what demand response does is, when sure occasions happen on this instance, winter storm Uri — granted, there have been some main points that occurred with the precise infrastructure that induced a few of these issues to occur. However miners are incentivized to close off as a result of the ability begins to grow to be too costly. So that they get past their breakeven level in the event that they weren’t capable of shut down or they didn’t shut down.

Properly, now everybody’s paying a big value for power. There are some rules on that so…



Supply hyperlink

RELATED ARTICLES

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

Most Popular

Recent Comments